Can AI Create a Better YouTube Thumbnail Than a Human?
The debate on whether humans or Artificial Intelligence (AI) can create better, more engaging content has been ongoing for a while. Creative people across platforms have been battling it out—some cheering for AI as the future of creativity, while others see it as a threat to their artistic value. But instead of just watching the debate from the sidelines, we decided to dive headfirst into it with a real-life competition.
We set out to see who could create a better, more click-worthy YouTube thumbnail: a human or AI. Spoiler alert: the results were surprising!
Setting the Stage
We chose a video from our YouTube channel to test this epic showdown. The video, which discussed transforming RSS feeds into videos, had already performed well organically. The goal was simple: create the best possible thumbnail to boost its click-through rate (CTR) and overall performance.
We set three clear criteria for this competition: cost, efficiency, and results. Which method would be the most budget-friendly? Which would be the easiest and fastest to produce? And, finally, which thumbnail would bring in the most clicks?
Round 1: The Human Touch
Our first stop was Fiverr, where we scoured the platform for a talented thumbnail designer. After an extensive search (trust us, we took this seriously), we found a designer who seemed like the perfect fit. We provided him with a few simple instructions, and in no time, he delivered three eye-catching thumbnails.
The human designer took our direction and quickly turned it into polished, professional visuals. The process was smooth, communication was clear, and we had our thumbnails in less than 24 hours. It cost us $18 for three thumbnails—definitely affordable for high-quality work.
Round 2: Enter AI
Next up, it was time to see what AI could do. For this, we teamed up with ChatGPT for direction and MidJourney for the actual visuals. AI had to come up with the thumbnail concept and execute it.
The results? Well, they were a bit... underwhelming. Initially, the AI-created thumbnail was generic and confusing. So, we had to take a step back and adjust our approach. We started with a simpler concept—something like a surprised man—and tried to refine it from there. MidJourney, however, struggled with executing our vision. It kept ignoring key elements like the video symbol we wanted to include, and communication with AI was far from perfect.
After a series of iterations, we finally got something that was usable, but not without some manual tweaks. For this, we paid $10 for a month's subscription to MidJourney, which allowed for essentially unlimited variations. This gave AI the edge in cost, but efficiency? Not so much.
Cost vs. Efficiency: AI Takes the Lead
In terms of raw numbers, AI came out on top in the cost category. With just $10, we could generate as many thumbnails as we needed, compared to the $18 we paid for three thumbnails from the human designer.
However, when it came to efficiency, the human designer won hands down. The AI process took far longer and required more back-and-forth adjustments. It also struggled to grasp the finer points of our design requests, something a human could easily pick up on.
So, at this point, we had one point for AI on cost and one point for the human on efficiency. But the real test was still to come: results.
The Final Showdown: AI vs. Human Performance
We took the thumbnails to the final battleground: YouTube. To make things fair, we used two of the human-made thumbnails and one AI-generated thumbnail. We wanted to get the widest reach possible, so we put $100 into sponsoring the video over the course of two weeks.
What followed was an epic, two-week-long battle where the real judge was audience engagement. We measured views, impressions, and most importantly, click-through rates (CTR) for both sets of thumbnails. In total, the video garnered 11,000 views and 333,000 impressions across the thumbnails.
And the results? Drum roll, please…
It was a tie! Yep, despite our best predictions, the CTRs were virtually identical. Both the human-created and AI-generated thumbnails performed almost exactly the same, with no clear winner.
What Does This All Mean?
So, where does that leave us? Does AI reign supreme, or do humans still have the upper hand? In this case, the answer was a bit of both.
While AI has clear advantages in terms of cost and scalability, it still lacks the nuanced touch that only humans can provide. Our human designer quickly understood what we were going for and was able to deliver creative results with minimal effort on our part. AI, on the other hand, struggled with some of the finer details and required more input and corrections.
That said, the potential for AI to complement and enhance human creativity is undeniable. The best takeaway from this experience? The real magic happens when you use AI to amplify human creativity rather than replace it. AI is a tool that can put our creative skills on steroids, but it’s not quite ready to take over entirely.
A Glimpse into the Future
While this battle may have ended in a tie, it’s clear that AI is continuing to evolve and improve. We may not be at "Judgment Day" just yet, but there’s no doubt that AI will play an even bigger role in creative fields in the coming years.
For now, though, the balance lies in using both human creativity and AI's capabilities to their fullest potential. As AI becomes more integrated into creative processes, we’ll likely see even more hybrid approaches, where both humans and machines work together to produce the best possible results.
